Původně biologická zbraň - technologie mRNA | Wolfgang Wodarg (1 část) 2026

We welcome you cordially here to the Inovace republiky broadcast as we continue documenting the Czech and Slovak journey out of Covid. But today, I would say it's also the European and Western journey out of Covid. For many of us, it seems that the Covid situation is over, that these matters are closed, are being investigated, or have even been resolved. Many people have actually forgotten or are pushing it out of their minds. Many people are afraid of the truth. And I think, on the contrary, the Covid situation is very important right now because it exposes all the other crises of today and future crises as well, the interconnection of politics, business, and military or secret services. I don't want to delay things now, as I am on screen here often, but I am preparing myself to tell my story of involvement in the government of the Czech Republic much more in the near future. Especially for that reason, when I see what is happening today and how the current government is proceeding. But at this moment, I would like to welcome Mr. Wolfgang Wodarg. It is a great honor for me. I must say that I often think back to our meetings in Germany and then later here in Prague. Germany, I would like to refer to those documentary interviews from Germany. Internet Since the book launch , a lot of time has passed, and we see that some information is trickling into the mainstream of the Western world. We published the book and are pleased to see that some information is now clearly seeping into the Western world. Therefore, my question, I believe, is obvious. How do you perceive the reflection on the Covid era and any potential investigation? I must say it with a heavy heart, because there is no reflection on what happened back then. How do you see that? Well, the most important thing and what is most clear now is that a great deal of damage was done and that there was no protection against anything oh >> and that there was nothing we needed to be protected from, no. Because it was a big, yes, a big fraud. >> They made us afraid. The Chinese put on a show in Wuhan. Wuhan people dead on camera. Do you consider this a form of media fake news, because I remember those images well? And the Chinese then took on the task of showing the world that something evil was coming. At the WHO, there is a regime the institution where that gentleman is involved. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust are involved, the Chinese head of the health authority is there, and the Russian ambassador is there. Minister of Health Russia The important health politicians of the world are gathered there. health and they planned it, they chose this coronavirus because it was something that hadn't been considered important before. Coronaviruses are always there, always about 10%of all flu cases involve coronaviruses. You can also find them in tests. But they were never dangerous. >> And now they said these are very dangerous, and the test was used to demonstrate that. And then they also had to show that they are dangerous, that people are dying and something is happening. danger by showing that people are dying. They did this in a few places in the world. In Bergamo, in New York, in England, in some regions, in Alsace a bit, in Madrid, they showed this in a few selected places around the world. Bergamo, New York, Madrid, Lorraine, but in Rome or in San Francisco or in Andalusia, nothing was going on, nothing was to France does not exist, they only observed a few points for just one month. a pandemic is when people die, that is something serious where many people get sick, but you could not see anything in the illness figures. I have the illness figures in Germany and in China, well, in different countries, there are monitoring systems, I have always observed them before. I knew the numbers from both Germany and China already, and I was able to compare these numbers, this data. And the entire year 2020 was not in Germany, it started in October 2020, the old, human until China people dying. That was because, when they tested the staff in nursing homes and hospitals with the PCR test, and if it was positive, the staff was sent into quarantine, which meant there was no staff left in hospitals or social care facilities for the elderly. There was no staff because , thanks to the PCR test, the staff was sent into quarantine. This was very bad in Saxony and Thuringia at the border with Poland and the Czech Republic, because many caregivers commuted from these countries and worked in Germany. And they were, of course, also missing during the lockdown. >> The same in Bergamo, they also implemented a lockdown there, and it was mainly caregivers from the Balkans and Eastern Bloc countries. And in March and April, they quickly went home with their suitcases before the lockdown came. them in some places an extreme shortage of nursing staff situation. And on top of that, they were forbidden from entering the homes to help. There were several homes where the dead were only found in their beds after two days because there was no staff there. Then the police or the fire department came to help and they saw the misery, discovering people lying there dead in several or many facilities. It took one or two days for the police and firefighters to even discover something like that. Among young people and those who were employed, there was actually a lower mortality rate. Not a single person died during the entire pandemic there. You can really see that, you can observe it. There is excess mortality among those aged 80 and over, which is up to 30%from the first [of the year]. A real concentration of mortality in 2020. And among young people, the employed, and middle-aged people, everything showed lower mortality. Excess mortality among young people only began in the spring of 2021. It climbed up. It was highest among the people who got the shot or who had to take the shot because otherwise they couldn't work or couldn't travel. Especially those who were, so to speak, vaccinated. Those who had to be vaccinated just to work at all. That is , you can read it directly from the mortality rate; you don't even need the diagnosis to know if more or fewer people died. The diagnoses that were made can be forgotten anyway; they are not useful, because hospitals received a lot of money for the Covid-19 diagnosis. In the USA, in New York, they received over 30,000 for a patient who was diagnosed with Covid-19. >> And everyone who arrived was tested; if they were positive, they were then put on a ventilator, whether they needed it or not. It is a mistake to intubate and ventilate a normal case of pneumonia. Intubating and using a machine to breathe, which is what was commonly done. Everyone got a test, and whoever was positive counted as Covid and was connected to the machine. >> You provide oxygen if necessary, but intubating is completely unusual. In a normal case of pneumonia, you just provide oxygen through a mask at most. It is absolutely unusual for people to be intubated, meaning they had pressure forced into their mouths. You have to sedate them so they stay calm and can tolerate it. In England, these people were treated with hypnotics so they would sleep and not realize they were being forced to breathe. You can see the consumption of Midazolam rising; in the month of April, it shoots up like a church steeple. So. And parallel to that, excess mortality also rises; we can compare the curve of the need for Midazolam, the drug used for that. It is a huge, rapid increase, and the curve for excess mortality is exactly the same. >> That is what happened in Europe from the beginning. It started in Bergamo, and later in New York and other regions like Madrid, and continued until the beginning of May. During that time, people were killed to show us that a dangerous disease was on the move. They did this to show us how dangerous this infection is. Fortunately, only in a few specific places. Even in Stockholm, where things were completely different in Sweden, where they handled the lockdown differently, they still locked down nursing homes for one month, and relatives were not allowed to visit. Even though they did everything differently and had no lockdowns, they still locked down the relatives in nursing homes for one month. There was also a brief period of excess mortality in the region around Stockholm. Among the elderly. >> Mhm. That means a disease was faked here, and we were made afraid of it. And what they did was: they tested with a test that is completely useless for diagnosing a disease or making any statement about infectivity, just to instill fear and keep the "disease" going by using a test that is completely unsuitable and not developed for that purpose. And the whole thing served to make us willing to take this injection. We were told that this injection is the only salvation we have from this dangerous disease. In reality , they convinced us that we could only escape this horror through vaccination. This technology, the genetic engineering used here, meaning the administration of modified RNA, has been patented and known for quite some time, and they have always wanted to apply this technology. RNA, or gene manipulation, has been known for a very long time, and they needed to get it to market. but only, genetically alter them so they don't get the flu. People would have said, "Are you crazy?" normally used but it worked; now they have been made so afraid that they tolerate it. And the people who were afraid could be recognized on the street; they were wearing a mask. It's a brilliant trick to see if the fear-mongering is effective or not. I am a doctor of hygiene and also a lung specialist, and I worked in clinics for a long time where it was always debated whether one should wear a mask or not. As a specialist, internist, and pulmonologist, we often discussed what masks are actually for and if they are any use on the face at all. And there are only very few indications, perhaps for active tuberculosis, or in cases where you put the mask on the patient, not on the people who are coming in. There are only very few typical diagnoses for which a mask is used, for example, active tuberculosis, and it is placed on the faces of the sick, not others. And only when someone else comes into contact with them. >> So there are very strict rules, and the handling of these masks must be trained . You must not wear them for longer than forty-five minutes. You have to be told beforehand what is important, and there must be a proper briefing. How to handle these masks, it is an entire process. People must be taught how they have to be taken off, there must be breaks; none of that was done. That was all suddenly forgotten, yes, or it was ignored, and this mask was even put on children, everywhere—in kindergartens , at home—everyone had to wear the stuff, and if someone wasn't wearing a mask, there were mask checks at the supermarket checkout. All of that was suddenly forgotten. Suddenly, it played no role at all. Worst of all, they forced even children to sit in them for hours, and when we went somewhere and weren't wearing them, in the supermarket we heard, "How come you don't have one?" That has all become clear now. There are scientific studies that state very clearly that such a spread of a virus—like what was seen here, a virus that spreads like that— does not exist. But you can perform the test anywhere, and you find cases. the test And if you perform the test in an intensive care unit, you will also find many who are dying. That if you perform this test in intensive care units, you are also testing people who are dying; on average, 10%die there. Drosten already did that in 2003. In Guangdong during SARS 1. He found exactly 8,000 cases in those intensive care units, but that was a region with over 126 million people. That is one and a half times as many as in Germany, and he found 8,000 cases there using his PCR test in intensive care. Mr. Drosten, a well-known name from Germany, tested his test back in 2002 with the so-called SARS-CoV-1 in China, where he had 8,000 cases and practiced how to work with the test in that sense. >> So he prepared and practiced that back then. That is why he was the right person to be allowed to do it all over again now. And in the meantime, for almost 15 years, nobody looked for coronaviruses at all anymore. For 15 years we heard nothing about coronavirus, but this was precisely the reason why Mr. Drosten was chosen to manage the entire SARS-CoV pandemic, because he had already tested everything and had it all planned out. And those coronaviruses didn't exist, they just simulated them to have them ready for the operation. Yes, and that’s why it was said that this is something new and very dangerous. And we were kept busy arguing with each other. Did it come from the lab or the market, did it come from animals, or where did it come from? We had nothing but side discussions about distracting topics, discussions that were completely irrelevant. Is it from some bat market, or is it from a laboratory in China, or how did it get here? Is it artificial, is it natural? It was all completely pointless to discuss. Or where are you? I once asked Chat GPT: " Uh, what is better if you want to wage biological warfare, if you want to harm people with biological weapons, specifically by releasing dangerous viruses, or is it better to inject people with a syringe, with a genetic or toxic syringe, after you've scared them and told them they have to take it ?" I asked what is actually the better method of waging biological war against people. Should it be a virus that is truly dangerous and harmful, or should it be a genetic substance, something like this vaccination, which is given only because we believe in that virus? And GPT naturally said the second one is much smarter. Because you can specifically harm the people you want to harm, and you can do that all over the world; they all go along with it because you can agree, "You don't give your people anything dangerous, you just go along with it, but you don't have to poison your people." >> The answer is quite clear; the latter is much more effective because you can choose places in the world where you can target and harm people with those injections. In some places, you give them what is effective, while in others , you give them something completely different. One example is the mortality rate or the excess mortality statistics from Eurostat. You can see there that in Germany in 2022 there was a very strong excess mortality. It’s dark. And in Sweden, they received the same amount of injections, the same injections, and also had the same number of boosters, everything exactly the same per inhabitant, but there is no excess mortality at all there. At the same time in Sweden, where they received the same injections in the same numbers and boosted just like the Germans, there was no excess mortality. Sweden had just become a NATO member at the time. NATO >> and this whole distribution of the toxic injections, that was a bioweapon that was developed as a bioweapon. we were told it had to be stored at 80 degrees. and of course, a hospital or a doctor's office cannot do that. >> The Bundeswehr medical center in Quakenbrück did that for all of Germany. and they did so until May '22. Then they handed it back to the Paul Ehrlich Institute. >> General Breuer, who was a Major General at the time, was responsible for the entire management in the Chancellery. He was subsequently appointed Inspector General of the Bundeswehr, the highest-ranking general in the Bundeswehr. Breuer, who led this operation at the time, was assigned to the Chancellery and was later promoted to the position of Inspector General of the entire Bundeswehr, the West German army, the highest general of the West German army. Injections, pardon, the injections that led to the cells of the injected people everywhere in the body, in different places, being genetically modified, technologically modified, and then suddenly degenerating; they suddenly produced a protein that a cell in the body normally does not produce. The function of this injection, of course, consists of programming many cells throughout the body, different cells, to genetically produce toxic foreign proteins and...namely the spike protein. >> And cells that do this are immediately destroyed by the immune system, by the T-lymphocytes that flow by and are everywhere in the body. Those programmed cells that create this are, of course, immediately recognized as foreign and attacked by our immune systems. And when a cell is destroyed, wounds form there. There, in the vessel wall, in the endothelium, in the inner lining of the vessels, the capillaries, especially the small ones, thrombi form , defects occur, the blood begins to clot. The blood can escape from the veins into the surrounding area; all such things can happen. And then there are many different symptoms. In the brain, in the liver, in the skin. Everywhere the endothelium is damaged by this process of genetic programming, wounds arise, defects arise, and this happens in all vessels, down to the smallest capillaries. And depending on that, thrombi form there, bleeding occurs, and inflammation develops. And in which organ does this occur? We see various clinical symptoms, from the brain, liver, and heart to other organs . There were so many young athletes suddenly dropping dead. The explanation for this, in my opinion, is that they have a very strong blood flow in their muscles. that well-trained athletes have strong musculature that is very well perfused, and therefore these injections can simply be given like that, without needing to aspirate to see if one is in a vessel. Otherwise, aspiration is recommended for every medic, which means checking that the needle is not in a vein, to prevent any complications. Therefore, in muscular athletes, the chance that it enters the vein is about 5%. That is why it is about 5%, that it injects billions of nanoparticles with technical information, which are not recognized by the immune system. They can distribute everywhere; they also go into the organs, meaning that primarily our immune system cannot recognize them as they cross the barrier into the brain, which has a special, which has a special protection. And when that flows in athletes, or the blood that comes out of the vein flows into the right atrium. All blood flows into the right atrium of the heart. And suddenly there are very, very many billions of these nanoparticles that can enter the cells. And that is where the pacemaker is, located exactly under the lining of the right atrium. That is where the cardiac conduction system is, i.e., the pacemaker. And it is then, of course, tremendously disrupted by this inflammatory reaction. And the center fires a signal roughly every second for the heart to contract. If you flood this place, so sensitive, with billions of these prepared particles, it is obvious that it will be damaged. This explains these sudden deaths very well. This explains the sudden deaths of young, healthy athletes very well. The only one who is from of course, one must continue to aspirate. They wanted that, and then they had a dispute with the ministry and prevailed. The only resistance I noted was from Danish doctors, who at the very least insisted that one should aspirate when giving the injection. They had a conflict with the ministry over this, but they prevailed. Yes, so this was an operation that was planned by the military, also with the bioweapon being developed as a countermeasure against a dangerous alleged virus. It was all produced as protection against dangerous viruses. Everything was part of military research and was organized by the US Department of Defense. This was being produced even when the clinical studies were not yet available . They let the clinical studies run on the side just for show and manipulated them so that the results they wanted to show came out. They even lied. Production was already underway while the studies that were supposed to approve it had not yet been completed. The studies ran only in parallel to practically as an alibi, just to make it look like something was happening. But it was clear that with such an emergency authorization, the market was [manipulated]. The United States Secretary of Health only needs to ask: "Do we have anything else for this disease, or is there only this?" If they have nothing else, he says, then you are allowed to sell it. Regardless, the FDA isn't asked, the regulatory authority plays no role, no ethics committee, then the stuff can be sold and Pfizer had already been producing it here with BioNTech. In the United States, there is a formula for so-called emergency authorization. If the United States Secretary of Health asks, "Do we have anything else for this disease?" and is told "No, we don't," then he simply decides that this thing, this substance, will be administered. Yes, I must......that more actually died. They naturally also knew that it was dangerous. Confirm... >> and that is why it was diluted, the effect was diluted. Many people received something that had nothing dangerous in it. So they diluted the entire effectiveness of the substance by having many people receive something that wasn't actually that dangerous. >> In the side effect statistics of the USA......you can see that initially there were very toxic batches where there were many severe complications. ...side effects of this substance in the United States, it can be seen very clearly that the most toxic substances were administered. Then there were those where nothing happened at all, where there was no side effect. Those were mostly given later, there was nothing left in them, and then there were some where a little something happened; they examined the syringes and found that they were sometimes very , very contaminated. So there were whole plasmid rings still inside with antibiotic antigens. >> Then there were those that were resistant antigens. >> Then there were those that were only a little harmful, not as much as the most toxic ones, but they were contaminated with large doses of DNA plasmids. These plasmids, they are used in bacteria, which produce these genetic sequences. These are rings, and so that one can distinguish them—the cells that are changed, that have been successfully genetically altered, from which one can extract it, and the others that are not genetically altered—one simultaneously adds these antibiotics, uh, these antibiotic resistances. Then one can take those that have been successfully altered, they are resistant to antibiotics, and then one adds antibiotics and kills off the unaltered ones, and that’s how one gets the substance one wants. It is in the production......antibiotics, to distinguish the cells that are programmed from those that are not. An antibiotic is used that effectively sorts them by killing some of these cells. Yes, so these are things that, well, one knows very well today. >> and I am asked again and again, and people keep saying, I have never been this sick before. I had Covid, and I have never been this sick. Many people still say today that they had Covid and were so sick they had never experienced anything like it in their lives. And there are also doctors who say, I have had some terribly sick patients. And, uh, I mean, if you look at the statistics, the epidemiology, it is best done where there is monitoring, where the same practices report every year, from the same facilities where the reports come from, which are standardized. There you can see if it is different from previous years. That means you have selected workplaces that report things like infection numbers and patient numbers every year, so you can compare well whether it is different. Nothing could be seen there. And of course, there were also in previous years, for example. In 2017, there was a severe flu winter. Where the hospitals were full, where there was also a lot of pneumonia, where people died, more than usual. Severe flu exists, the last one was in 2017. Back then there was a relatively high excess mortality, like the last big wave of relatively severe flu, and that happens, every winter some also die from the. >> This means that, of course, during the time when there is supposedly a pandemic, some have also died from the flu. But only one single test was done. They were no longer looking for influenza, but only for Covid. No one did any test to check for actual flu. Influenza. Jan Amos Comenius. Silver medal community coin sold out. Where is my home, a great symbol of our nation. A question and an answer at the same time, the last 200 pieces available. But there is a third medal, and perhaps much more important in that regard, because thanks to the story of the Baťa brothers, it is a story of cooperation, a story of brotherhood, a story of love, a story of entrepreneurship, innovation, and above all, a global story. Brothers who loved each other, but unfortunately, only Tomáš is talked about. Jan Antonín Baťa seems to have been singled out, pushed aside, and erased from our history. Yet he supported the Czechoslovak resistance, bought planes, donated a huge amount of his personal gold to the Czechoslovak government, and much more that is provable. We align ourselves with his story, his visions, his industrial cities, and also with the Czechoslovak resistance and everything that Jan Antonín Baťa created. We are preparing documentation , books, materials, and other things that we will gradually introduce to you . We would be happy if you purchase the silver medal and support all these activities; you will find the link to purchase this silver medal here. Thank you so much for your support, interest, feedback, sharing, and for potentially purchasing one coin or even more. Thank you very much.